Wednesday, January 24, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Labels
- about us (1)
- actionscript (1)
- ajax (3)
- amazon (2)
- anthropology (1)
- api (1)
- applications (1)
- asp.net (1)
- basecamp (2)
- basic skills (4)
- behavioral marketing (2)
- blinksale (1)
- blogging (7)
- blogosphere (5)
- blogs (4)
- brand (6)
- burning man; (2)
- burning man; rant (1)
- business (2)
- cakephp (1)
- cellsea (1)
- collaboration (1)
- community (10)
- conduit (1)
- context-sensitive help (1)
- crapware (1)
- credibility (5)
- dell (1)
- digitial divide (1)
- DST (1)
- dumb ideas (6)
- e (1)
- ecommerce (3)
- economy (1)
- enabling users (6)
- ethics (2)
- expectations (1)
- Facebook (2)
- firefox (1)
- flash (1)
- flex (1)
- fun things (1)
- gaming (1)
- gimp (1)
- gmail (1)
- hybrid (1)
- IBM (1)
- idea storm (1)
- image manipulation (1)
- internet explorer (2)
- javascript (1)
- Linked In (1)
- links (1)
- marketing (8)
- mashups (1)
- mavens (1)
- mba (10)
- netscape (1)
- networking (1)
- nosey (1)
- pandora (1)
- photoshop (1)
- php (1)
- project management (9)
- prototype (1)
- quote (1)
- rails (1)
- ria (1)
- rss (1)
- ruby (2)
- scriptaculous (1)
- shopping (2)
- social media (13)
- social networking (3)
- startups (1)
- stupid ideas (1)
- Sun (1)
- SXSW (2)
- symfony (1)
- tags (1)
- teams (1)
- technical communications (1)
- toyota (1)
- travel (1)
- trust (4)
- usability (4)
- video (2)
- web 2.0 (14)
- wesch (2)
- wikis (2)
- workshop (1)
- xml (1)
- Y2K (1)
1 comments:
I saw this article described on /. as "slashvertisement" (it's from PR Newswire!). Looks about right to me. We could break this down in any number of ways--how is "dependent" defined? How about "computer trouble?" Clearly we need this company! And then the biggie about spending time with the SO, guaranteed to get headlines but having nothing to do with computer support needs.
Not worth the electrons it was transmitted on, if you ask me.
Post a Comment